Home > Measurement & Analysis Instruments > The Ultimate Guide to Choosing pressure decay test

The Ultimate Guide to Choosing pressure decay test

Author: Justin

Aug. 06, 2024

33 0

Tags: Measurement & Analysis Instruments

Pressure Decay Test Method Guide

There are many different types of leak testing, so when you must test for leaks in the factory or the field, it pays to know which leak test is best for the task. Pressure decay testing is one of the most popular forms of leak testing because it is accurate and relatively easy.

Cell Instruments supply professional and honest service.

Pressure decay leak testing uses a pressure loss measurement to identify a specific leak rate, making it one of the most effective means of testing for leaks in virtually any type of part. It is a simple test that is easy to automate and ideal for isolating even the smallest leaks. You can conduct pressure decay testing using either air pressure or a vacuum. 

Applications for Pressure Decay Leak Testing

As the name suggests, pressure decay leak testing detects leaks by measuring changes in pressure either inside or outside of a part. Everything leaks to some degree, so pressure decay testing determines whether the size of the leakage is within tolerance. Overall, it is the best test to realize a quantitative measure for fluid leaks. 

Pressure decay testing is relatively easy, fast, and inexpensive, so it is often used in high-volume production industries. For example, it is used in automotive production to measure leakage in oil pans, engine blocks, cylinder heads, and other parts. Pressure decay testing is also used in testing medical devices, castings, appliances, consumer goods, and more. It can work well for both large and small parts.

How Pressure Decay Testing Works 

Conducting a pressure decay leak test is a relatively simple process. First, you need to seal the part to be tested. This is necessary so the part can either be pressurized or have its air evacuated to test for leaks.

Second, once the part is pressurized, it must be isolated from the pressure source. The change in pressure is measured over time to determine the leak rate, which can be expressed as a pressure loss over time or correlated to standardized volumetric flow (scc/min).

To ensure an accurate pressure decay test, you must establish specific test standards. For example, you want to establish load and unload times (i.e., the time to engage and disengage from the test). Although this may not impact the test results, it will impact the overall test time. You also want to establish a settling time to stabilize the pressure of the part and a minimum time to charge the part to ensure that optimal pressure is reached.

By establishing and maintaining a common set of test standards, you will get more accurate, consistent test results. Repeatable conditions also make it easier to obtain comparative results.

Variables that Affect Pressure Decay Testing 

Any time you test for leaks, you want to compensate for factors that may prevent accurate, repeatable results. There are several variables in pressure decay testing that can impact outcomes:

  • Time: You need to allow sufficient time for the test pressure to stabilize. To get consistent results, you must ensure the gas pressure has penetrated every nook and cranny in the test part.
  • Temperature: Temperature changes will affect the pressure measurement during testing. The pressurization process itself generates heat and must be stabilized prior to testing.
  • Elasticity: Some parts are elastic and stretch under pressure, so they need a longer settle time to reach a stable pressure.
  • Porosity: Porosity can affect pressure. If the part under test can absorb the gas used for testing, you must compensate for the absorption rate.
  • Debris: Watch for part debris that can cause excessive seal wear. Additionally, when pressure is released, loose particles can carry with the expelled gases, collect in the test instrument, and damage the test instrumentation valve seals.

For accurate, repeatable test results, you must have a long enough settle time to ensure the test part is stable. The settle time will vary based on conditions. For example, larger parts require a longer fill and test time. If the leak rate is decreased, you should increase your test time to get an accurate measurement. Increasing the test time will promote repeatable results, especially with flexible or porous parts that need longer to stabilize.

Benefits of Vacuum Leak Testing

You may want to use a vacuum instead of pressure for testing. The procedure is the same as pressure decay testing, only you extract air to create a vacuum rather than pressurize the part.

Vacuum leak testing is particularly useful for parts that are difficult to seal. It also reduces the required test time when faced with porous parts or thermal changes, increasing test accuracy. Additionally, vacuum leak testing provides more accurate, repeatable results when testing lower pressure parts.

The best way to approach any leak testing&#;including pressure decay testing&#;is to create a stable test environment. You want testing tools that are accurate and deliver repeatable results. You also want to eliminate as much background noise as possible, meaning the test environment should be free of dust or interfering materials and have a stable temperature and controlled humidity.  

Subtle factors can impact leak test results. Pressure decay testing is one of the most accurate leak tests available, but you still need to take precautions to ensure you have a stable, controlled test environment.

For more information about pressure decay leak testing, check out our blog posts and educational webinar.

You can also download our latest guide, Leak Testing 101: A Primer, or contact us with any questions you might have.

Ultimate Guide to Leak Testing Methods & Equipment

Leak Testing: A Guide

Leak testing is a procedure that inspectors use to determine whether an object or system is functioning within a specific leak limit.

Leaks occur when there is a defect&#;a hole, crack, or some other kind of flaw&#;in an object, allowing whatever the liquid or gas it is holding to flow out. Leak testing uses pressure to find these defects so that they can be addressed as part of regular maintenance procedures.

In general, leak tests are performed on objects that are used to store or move liquids or gases.

Leak testing is one of the most commonly used inspection methods. It falls into the category of non-destructive testing (NDT) methods because inspectors can perform it without permanently altering or damaging the object they&#;re inspecting.

[Non-destructive leak testing is just one of the NDT methods that inspectors use. Learn more about NDT in this in-depth guide.]


What Is Leak Testing?

In leak testing, inspectors use pressure to identify the presence of defects in an object that are causing leaks.

When substances leak out of a container they flow from where the pressure is higher pressure to where it is lower. Leak testing leverages this phenomenon, using pressure to generate flow toward lower pressure&#;that is, the location of leaks&#;while carefully monitoring that flow. 

When should leak testing be performed? Primarily when testing for flaws within a closed system.

The success of a leak test depends on the object that is being tested. Different types of materials and objects may respond differently to the high pressures typically used in leak testing to force a liquid or gas out of a defect, thus revealing its presence and location.

In leak testing materials, inspectors will be looking for defects like:

  • Cracks

  • Holes

  • Weak seals

  • Other flaws or imperfections that may be allowing a gas or liquid to leak out of an object or system

Here are the industries that commonly use leak testing as part of their maintenance processes:

  • Automotive

  • Consumer goods

  • Medical Devices

  • Packaging

    Are you interested in learning more about micro leak tester? Contact us today to secure an expert consultation!

  • Sealed Electronics

Advances in Leak Testing

Over the last several years, advancements in sensors, chips, valves, and other types of technology have helped make leak testing more sensitive and capable as an NDT method.

All of these advances have made leak testing faster and more accurate, and have in turn helped companies to improve the quality of their manufacturing processes and their overall output.

One of the biggest advances in leak testing has been the advent of the Internet of Things. Now, with an internet connection, inspectors can collect, monitor, and share leak testing data remotely, allowing them to get the information they need in a timely manner to ensure ideal maintenance.

This data can be evaluated not just by inspectors but also by manufacturing engineers, production managers, maintenance managers, and other stakeholders in the manufacturing process, allowing for improved, real-time insights into the conditions of the assets they&#;re using. 

Leak Testing Methods

Here are some of the most common leak test methods:

  • Burst. This leak test method uses either a destructive or a non-destructive test that ramps pressure in order to find the point at which the device will break open (i.e., burst).

  • Chamber. This leak test method is used to identify defects that are causing leaks in a sealed environment, like a device or package, that was not built with an opening to allow for the introduction of pressure for leak testing.

  • Pressure crack. This leak test method is used to identify &#;weeping&#; in valves with a downstream sensor monitor.

  • Pressure / vacuum. This leak test method uses the pressurization of a test object and a reference volume. If a leak is present, the difference between the two will decrease. (This process is fully automatic.)

  • Pressure decay. This leak test method uses the pressure change of an object or system under positive pressure to identify defects that are causing leaks.

  • Vacuum decay. This leak test method uses the pressure change of an object or system under negative pressure to identify defects that are causing leaks.

  • Occlusion. This leak test method identified obstructions in the flow path of a gas to identify defects that are causing leaks.

The leak test pressure limit for leak tests typically uses low pressure. Most codes for leak test pressure limits call for the pressure to be at least 15 psi or 25% of the design pressure (whichever pressure is less).

Leak Testing Considerations

Because a leakage inspection requires inspectors to insert pressure into an object in order to identify leaks it has some unique considerations as an NDT method. 

Here is an overview of things to keep in mind.

Acceptable leak rate

It&#;s important for inspectors and maintenance personnel to know the acceptable leak rate for an object or system when performing leak testing.

Not all leaks require maintenance&#;some may just require further monitoring, or even no action at all. Different industries will typically have guidelines detailing acceptable leak rates for different products and substances.

Manufacturing considerations

Before performing a leak test it&#;s important to consider the function for which a system, part, or object was originally made.

The target use case for a given object may require manufacturers to have created it in such a way that it will either retain or allow liquids to pass through it.

For example, a car part may be designed specifically so that gases can&#;t escape from it, or an IV may be designed to keep liquids inside it.

Material considerations

The substance that the object is made out of&#;its material&#;will impact a leak test, and should also be considered.

If a material is overly brittle or overly malleable, these qualities will directly relate to how the introduction of pressure will change the object, causing it to expand or change shape in some other way that should be considered when planning a leak test.

Medium considerations

The substance an object is made to hold must be considered when planning a leak test.

Different substances have different molecule sizes. When performing a leak test, it&#;s important to know the size of defect that might be acceptable, and the size that would be big enough to allow a specific liquid or gas to escape.

A related consideration is pressure, because different substances will respond differently to different ranges of pressure. A pressure range that is too high could potentially damage the object being tested, while a pressure range that is too low may return inconclusive results.

Leak Testing Equipment

Here are some examples of the types of equipment that is commonly used for various leak testing methods.

Air LeakAGE INSPECTION Devices

Photo credit: Zaxis

Air leak testing devices have displays that show inspectors data from ongoing leak tests. These devices can be used for a variety of types of leak testing, including vacuum decay, pressure decay, burst, chamber, and others.

Compact Pressure Decay Leak Tester

Photo credit: Zaxis

This kind of compact leak tester can be placed close to fixtures being used in leak testing, allowing inspectors to reduce the amount of connection volume needed for the test. This reduction in volume allows for a decrease in the time needed for the leak test and an increase in test sensitivity.

Large Display Leak Tester

Photo credit: Zaxis

Larger display leak testers like this one from Zaxis (called the 7i) have larger screens, greater internal capacity, larger test volumes, and allow for faster testing.

Leak Standard

Photo credit: Zaxis

Inspectors use leak standards to define the parameters of their leak test by creating a simulated leak in the part under test, or to compare multiple leak systems with each other.

Leak Testing Standards and Codes

Leak testing is commonly used for code-based inspections, and there will be a leak testing standard (or standards) in most countries that use these kind of tests for inspections.

Here are some of the more widely used leak testing codes:

ASME (AMERICAN SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS)

ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials)

ISO (International Organization for Standardization)

Comments

0