For more information, please visit our website.
Identifying special education services that help the student achieve her annual goals is critical.
Once the IEP team has set the annual goals for the student, the subsequent step is to draft the individualized services and supports needed to attain these goals. This component encompasses special education services, relevant related services, supplementary aids, and program modifications. These supports ensure that the student:
Outlined below are various services described in IDEA, along with examples for Yazmina, a blind high school student.
Yazmina learns to read and write in braille from a teacher specialized in educating visually impaired students (TVI).
Yazmina receives orientation and mobility (O&M) training to navigate independently using a cane from an O&M specialist.
Yazmina benefits from various accommodations to succeed in general education, such as a larger desk, materials in braille, extended test times, and a peer guide for band activities.
Yazmina’s teachers are trained in her equipment use and supported by the TVI in translating materials into braille.
For further exploration on supplementary aids and services and program modifications, Jim Shriner and Tamara McLean provide insight in extended IRIS interviews.
The IEP statement of services needs to be clear to ensure resources are committed effectively. The IEP team must consider what the student requires to achieve her IEP goals using the guiding questions provided below.
What services and supports are needed?
How often should services and supports be provided?
How much time per day/week is needed?
Who will provide the services and supports?
Where will the services and supports be provided?
When will services begin and end?
Additionally, IDEA requires considering special factors such as positive behavioral interventions and supports (PBIS), language needs, braille instruction, communication needs, and assistive technology.
Drew's case underscores the importance of addressing all of the student’s needs and using evidence-based practices. Drew's progress at a private school with a behavioral intervention plan (BIP) highlights two key considerations for IEP teams:
The Federal Register includes federal agency regulations and notices. In 2006, the U.S. Department of Education emphasized using methods based on peer-reviewed research where available when deciding on special education services.
Drew’s improved academics after addressing behavioral challenges at the private school illustrate the necessity of addressing behavior in IEPs. If a student’s behavior impedes learning, PBIS must be considered. Failing to include PBIS, schedule IEP meetings to review behavioral concerns, or implement behavioral supports may result in denying FAPE.
Using evidence-based practices when determining services is crucial. While some practices may lack a formal evidence base, promising practices can be prioritized when evidence-based practices are not applicable. Evidence-based, promising, research-based, and emerging practices have varying levels of validation and should be understood and utilized accordingly.
For more information, visit Touch-China.
In-depth insights on the distinctions between these practices and prioritizing their use are shared in interviews with Bryan Cook, PhD.
Providing relevant school personnel with a short form specifying their IEP responsibilities and outlining confidentiality requirements can facilitate effective IEP implementation.
For more information, please visit Touch Display Module for Medical.
Comments
0